Kenneth Rubinstein will be a featured speaker at the forum “Russia & CIS Clients: New Risks & Alternative Solutions” on March 11, 2015 in Zurich, Switzerland.
Continue Reading
Offshore Asset Protection Trusts and FBAR Reporting
We again remind readers that FinCEN Form 114 (formerly TD 90-22.1), the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (the “FBAR”), for calendar year 2013, is due by June 30, 2014. The FBAR must be filed electronically.
As we wrote previously, in 2011, the U.S. Treasury Department changed the FBAR filing requirements to now apply to U.S. grantors of foreign trusts, and in some cases their U.S. beneficiaries.
The FBAR is required to be filed by a U.S. person who has a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, any foreign financial account (including bank, securities or other types of financial accounts), if the aggregate value of the financial account(s) exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. If you are subject to the FBAR filing requirement, the 2013 FBAR is due by June 30, 2014.
U.S. grantors (also known as settlors) of foreign asset protection trusts are deemed to be the owners of all trust assets for tax purposes. Thus, the FBAR filing requirement applies to such grantors, whether or not they actually control trust assets and whether or not they receive distributions from the trust.
The 2011 revised regulations now extend the FBAR requirement to some U.S. beneficiaries of foreign trusts, including foreign asset protection trusts. The new regulations apply to U.S. beneficiaries of a foreign trust who have a reportable financial interest in the trust. A U.S. person has a reportable financial interest if the U.S. person had more than a fifty percent (50%) present beneficial interest in the assets of a trust or if the U.S. person received more than fifty percent of the income of the trust. The beneficial interest in the assets of the trust must be a “present” beneficial interest for the FBAR to apply. A beneficiary of a purely discretionary trust, i.e., where trust distributions are made solely in the discretion of a trustee (asset protection trusts created by this firm are purely discretionary trusts) does not have a “present” interest. However, with respect to the trust income, a beneficiary who receives more than fifty percent of trust’s “current” (i.e., annual) income has a financial interest that is reportable on the FBAR.
Under prior FBAR regulations, there was ambiguity as to whether a discretionary trust beneficiary was subject to the FBAR. Usually, beneficiaries of a foreign asset protection trust receive distributions at the discretion of the foreign trustee. The new rules clarify that only a present beneficial interest gives rise to the FBAR and only beneficiaries who receive more than fifty percent of a trust’s current income are subject to the FBAR.
Please also note the following with respect to the FBAR requirement:
- Even if the trust account was closed during 2013, if the account existed at any point during 2013, an FBAR is required.
- The requirement to file the FBAR exists irrespective of whether you filed new IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets. Please contact us for a copy of our memorandum regarding new Form 8938.
- The June 30, 2014 deadline is the deadline for receipt of the FBAR by the Treasury Department.
- Even if you have an extension for filing your tax returns, the 2013 FBAR is still due by June 30, 2014. There are no extensions for the FBAR deadline.
- The FBAR is now required to be filed electronically.
We also take this opportunity to remind you again that foreign asset protection trusts also give rise to filing IRS Forms 3520 and 3520-A, as well as Form 8938.
Having established an offshore asset protection trust to safeguard your assets from attack by creditors and litigants, it is crucial to preserve the integrity of the trust and to be in compliance with all IRS requirements. Please contact us with any questions.
2013 Year End Notes, Part 3: Offshore Considerations
During 2013, the IRS and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) continued to successfully attack offshore banking “secrecy”. The IRS’ success against UBS and other banks eroded Swiss banking secrecy, effectively ending “going offshore” to hide money from the IRS. Going offshore for asset protection from civil creditors, however, is still viable and effective, but must be tax-compliant.Continue Reading
Everything You Wanted to Know about Antigua Private Foundations
Our senior partner Kenneth Rubinstein was the author of the International Foundations Act of 2007, passed by the Parliament of Antigua and Barbuda and enacted into law. Kenneth also wrote Antigua’s International Trust Act and International LLC Act.
Kenneth has now authored the chapter on Antigua and Barbuda private foundations which is part of Private Foundations World Survey, edited by Johanna Niegel and Richard Pease, Oxford University Press, 2013. The chapter contains detailed information on Antigua as an Offshore jurisdiction, Antigua’s foundation law, foundation governance, asset protection issues, taxation issues, as well as discussion on issues of forced heirship and divorce.
For additional information, please see:
Epilogue: Complacency Is The Enemy of Good Asset Protection Planning
For the prior history of the court case United States v. Grant, please see our article here.
After beating the IRS, Arline Grant became careless and sloppy. In 2011, she ordered the foreign trustees to make periodic cash transfers to her totaling more than $500,000. These transfers were made to various accounts in her children’s names that she controlled, as well as to an account in her name in Bermuda. In addition, the trusts now provided for mandatory quarterly distributions to her. The IRS discovered the transfers and brought Ms. Grant before a new federal judge who held her in contempt for violation the repatriation order that was issued in 2008 and was still in effect. (Remember, in 2008 the federal court ordered Arline to repatriate trust funds and pay the proceeds to the IRS, but then refused to hold her in contempt for failing to do so because the court determined that she tried to comply but had no control over the trustees.)Continue Reading
Offshore Asset Protection Trusts are Subject to FBAR Disclosure; Deadline is June 30, 2012
This is a reminder that the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”), T.D. 90-22.1, for calendar year 2011, is due by June 30, 2012.
As discussed previously, the U.S. Treasury Department in 2011 changed the FBAR filing requirements to now apply to U.S. beneficiaries of foreign trusts, along with their U.S. grantors.
The FBAR is required to be filed by a U.S. person who has a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, any foreign financial account (including bank, securities or other types of financial accounts), if the aggregate value of the financial account(s) exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year. If you are subject to the FBAR filing requirement, the 2011 FBAR is due by June 30, 2012.
Grantors (also known as settlors) of foreign asset protection trusts are deemed to be the owners of all trust assets for tax purposes. Thus, the FBAR filing requirement applies to such grantors, whether or not they actually control trust assets and whether or not they receive distributions from the trust.
The 2011 revised regulations now extend the FBAR requirement to some U.S. beneficiaries of foreign trusts, including foreign asset protection trusts. The new regulations apply to U.S. beneficiaries of a foreign trust who have a reportable financial interest in the trust. A U.S. person has a reportable financial interest if the U.S. person had more than a fifty percent (50%) present beneficial interest in a trust’s assets or if the U.S. person received more than fifty percent of the income of the trust. The beneficial interest in the assets of the trust must be a “present” beneficial interest for the FBAR to apply. A beneficiary of a purely discretionary trust, i.e., where trust distributions are made solely in the discretion of a trustee does not have a “present” interest. However, with respect to the trust income, a beneficiary who receives more than fifty percent of trust’s “current” (i.e., annual) income has a financial interest that is reportable on the FBAR.
Under prior FBAR regulations, there was ambiguity as to whether a discretionary trust beneficiary was subject to the FBAR. Usually, beneficiaries of a foreign asset protection trust received distributions at the discretion of the foreign trustee. The new rules clarify that only a present beneficial interest gives rise to the FBAR and only beneficiaries who receive more than fifty percent of a trust’s current income are subject to the FBAR.
Please also note the following with respect to the FBAR requirement:
- Even if the trust account was closed during 2011, if the account existed at any point during 2011, an FBAR is required.
- The requirement to file the FBAR exists irrespective of whether you filed new IRS Form 8938, Statement of Foreign Financial Assets. Please see our discussion regarding new Form 8938.
- The June 30, 2012 deadline is the deadline for receipt of the FBAR by the Treasury Department (unlike IRS Forms which must be postmarked by, e.g., April 15).
- Even if you have an extension for filing your tax returns, the 2011 FBAR is still due by June 30, 2012. There are no extensions for the FBAR deadline.
- A new FBAR form was issued in January 2012. Even though the new FBAR form is substantially similar to the prior version, you should use the new form.
We also take this opportunity to remind you again that foreign asset protection trusts also give rise to filing IRS Forms 3520 and 3520-A, as well as new Form 8938.
Having established an offshore asset protection trust to safeguard your assets from attack by creditors and litigants, it is crucial to preserve the integrity of the trust and to be in compliance with all IRS requirements.
Please contact us with any questions.
Do You Have Foreign Assets?
NEW IRS FORM 8938 REQUIRES DISCLOSURE BY APRIL 17, 2012
Over the last few years, the U.S. government has enacted a series of laws and regulations designed to create greater transparency of assets held overseas by U.S. taxpayers. In order to track and tax those foreign assets, the IRS has created Form 8938, Statement of Specific Foreign Financial Assets, a new form which requires taxpayers who own certain specified foreign assets to disclose these assets annually to the IRS. Many taxpayers who own such specified foreign assets are now required to file Form 8938, or risk being penalized by the IRS. The requirement to file new Form 8938 is already effective. The form is due by April 17, 2012, along with your Form 1040, for calendar year 2011.
The new form is broad in its coverage of foreign assets that require disclosure. Foreign assets required to be reported include:
- foreign bank and brokerage accounts (which are already reportable on Form TD 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts, known as the “FBAR”);
- stock of foreign corporations and interests in foreign limited liability companies (LLCs), partnerships and other entities, whether publicly traded or privately held;
- interests in foreign Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) (but interests in Passive Foreign Investment Companies [PFICs] that are reported on IRS Form 8621 need not be repeated on new Form 8938);
- interests in a foreign entity such as a trust or foundation;
- ownership of investment instruments and contracts issued by a foreign entity, including foreign annuity contracts and insurance policies (also already subject to FBAR disclosure);
- interests in a foreign investment fund, hedge fund, mutual fund and private equity fund (but note the PFIC exemption above);
Note that even though certain foreign assets may not be reportable on new Form 8938, these assets may still be reportable on other IRS forms and on the FBAR. Note also that even though an asset is already reportable on, e.g., the FBAR, it may be reportable on Form 8938 as well, notwithstanding the resulting redundancy. It is also important to note that even if a foreign asset is not reportable if directly owned (e.g., real estate or bullion), if such asset is owned by a foreign entity, a U.S. taxpayer’s interest on the foreign entity is reportable.
Form 8938 requires details of the foreign assets, along with their values. Form 8938 is required if the total value of all foreign assets exceeds certain predefined threshold amounts, depending on the taxpayer’s residency during the tax year. In general, reporting is required for assets valued in excess of $50,000 for a single U.S. taxpayer and $100,000 for a married couple filing jointly, living in the U.S. If the U.S. taxpayer lives abroad, he or she must report any assets in excess of $200,000 for a single taxpayer and $400,000 for a married couple filing jointly. Financial accounts, and the assets in those accounts, held at a foreign branch of a U.S. financial institution or a U.S. branch of a foreign financial institution are not subject to reporting on Form 8938.
If a taxpayer has reported the foreign assets on another IRS form (e.g., Form 3520 for foreign trusts, Form 5471 for foreign corporations, etc.), he or she need not report these assets on Form 8938, but must still complete Part IV of Form 8938 and specify on which other tax form the assets were reported. The amounts reported on the other IRS forms will count towards the aggregate threshold amount for Form 8938. Therefore, if the amounts reported by the taxpayer on the other IRS forms meet the Form 8938 threshold amount, then any other foreign assets not reported on the other forms must be disclosed on Form 8938.
There are numerous IRS penalties associated with a failure to report foreign assets, as well as potential fines and criminal prosecution. Taxpayers who own foreign assets and are unsure whether they must file new Form 8938 should seek guidance from an experienced offshore tax compliance attorney.
Additional Important Points
- The disclosure requirements for Form 8938 are already effective. While FATCA regulations are coming into effect over time, this new Form 8938 is due this year, i.e., with your 2011 tax return, due April 17, 2012, or later if you receive an extension.
- Form 8938 is an informational return, whereby ownership interests in foreign assets are reported. However, Form 8938 does not assess tax on foreign income. Income from foreign assets is reported on other forms such as Form 1040, Form 8621, etc. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code assesses income from all sources world wide. Income includes interest, capital gains, dividends, royalties, etc., from all foreign sources.
- Any interest in social security, social insurance or other similar foreign government program need not be reported on Form 8938.
However, an interest in a foreign pension plan or foreign retirement account requires reporting. - A mere signatory authority (e.g., power of attorney, co-signatory) over a foreign account does not require disclosure via Form 8938. However, the FBAR form is still required for a power of attorney or co-signatory authority.
- Taxpayers filing Form 8938 may still be required to file an FBAR in addition.
- Form 8938 requires the reporting of the value of foreign assets. Many cases, e.g., ownership of a fraction of a foreign entity or investment fund, may require complex valuation and obtaining financial information from foreign sources.
- With respect to beneficiaries of foreign trusts, whereas such beneficiaries are required to file an FBAR if they have a “present” beneficial interest (defined as the right to receive a mandatory distribution, or actual receipt of 50% of trust income or assets), Form 8938 is required if the trust beneficiary receives a distribution that, together with other specified foreign assets, meets the Form 8938 specified threshold (e.g., $50,000 for a single taxpayer; see supra). If the foreign trust is a discretionary trust and the U.S. taxpayer does not receive a distribution (or receives a distribution that, when combined with his/her other specified foreign assets, does not exceed his/her reporting threshold), the value of his/her interest in the trust is zero and therefore not subject to reporting.
- For the time being (until the IRS issues additional regulations), Form 8938 reporting requirements apply only to U.S. individuals. U.S. corporations and other entities are not required to report ownership or interest in foreign assets on Form 8938. (Note, however, that the FBAR does apply to entities like corporations).
- Form 8938 applies to various components of offshore asset protection structures (e.g., foreign trusts). However, the offshore asset protection is still intact, because Form 8938 is for IRS reporting purposes only and does not impact the integrity of a foreign asset protection structure. This form merely makes an already reportable offshore entity or asset more transparent to the government. As we have long counseled, foreign asset protection structures do not rely on secrecy and give no expectation of tax secrecy. However, vis-a-vis private civil creditors, tax complaint offshore strategies still offer concrete asset protection.
Conclusion
Taxpayers who own or have interests in specified foreign financial assets may have to report the existence and value of those assets on new IRS Form 8938, or face penalties. We have long assisted clients with the many compliance and disclosure requirements for offshore assets. We can assist in determining whether you are subject to new Form 8938, and can answer any other questions you have regarding U.S. tax compliance for foreign assets.
Is Offshore Asset Protection Still Viable?
Is Offshore Asset Protection Still Viable?
by Asher Rubinstein, Esq.
There has been much publicity over the last few years on the erosion of Swiss banking secrecy and the IRS offensive against “secret” foreign accounts, including jail sentences for Americans with non-compliant accounts at UBS and HSBC. Against this background, it is important to question whether protection of assets by moving them offshore is still viable. The answer is that offshore asset protection is not only still viable but remains extremely effective against civil creditors, provided that the offshore structure is tax compliant.
Fact 1: It Is Not Illegal for Americans to Have Foreign Assets
Americans can legally invest in foreign markets, own foreign real estate, own foreign businesses, and deposit their assets into foreign bank and brokerage accounts, provided that they disclose their foreign accounts to the U.S. government and pay U.S. tax on foreign income.
While there are some prohibitions against foreign investment by Americans (e.g., investing in or transacting with certain countries like Iran or North Korea), there is no prohibition against funding a foreign asset protection trust, opening a foreign bank account or buying a second home in a foreign country. While holding assets offshore remains legal, it is crucial to be tax compliant.
Fact 2: Foreign Asset Protection Does Not Rely on Secrecy
The IRS successes against UBS and Swiss banking secrecy, and prosecution of Americans with supposedly “secret” foreign accounts, demonstrate that foreign bank secrecy has been significantly eroded, if not destroyed . Yet, while we can no longer hide assets offshore from the IRS, we can still protect assets from private civil creditors and litigants.
Experienced and qualified lawyers who specialize in asset protection law understand that the effective protection of assets from civil adversaries does not involve “hiding” those assets. It is based upon the use of the laws of various jurisdictions, domestic and foreign, to legally protect assets while they are in plain view. Proper asset protection erects a crystal clear bullet-proof shield around your assets. In fact, the knowledge that your assets are legally protected often serves to discourage litigation or to force a settlement on favorable terms.
Fact 3: There Are Many Valid Reasons to Have an Offshore Presence
As our world becomes a smaller place, many people have a multinational presence. Business expansion into new markets or new sources of production is routine. Investment diversification into foreign currencies, foreign equities, funds and financial products is not only common, it may be financially wise. Many people are concerned about the viability or safety of the US financial system and the US dollar and have diversified their wealth outside the US. Maintaining foreign accounts and entities like foreign corporations, foundations or trusts may be useful for international business and prudent investment planning.
Our modern world is increasingly a web of domestic as well as foreign relationships, transactions and holdings. Sophisticated people understand the need for foreign options and foreign diversification. Among them is the use of foreign laws to protect hard-earned assets. Many people understand that their retirement plans in the US may provide for their later years, but that a protected nest-egg in a stable foreign country provides a greater level of assurance for wealth preservation.
Fact 4: Protecting Assets Offshore Is Legal and Effective, but You Can Have No Expectation of Avoiding Taxation
As noted above, placing assets in a foreign asset protection trust is legal and effective against future creditors. At the same time, it is crucial to recognize that while the assets are outside of the reach of creditors, they are not outside the reach of the IRS. Settling a foreign trust, for example, is legal and will safeguard your assets from creditor attack, but the IRS still considers trust assets to be your assets, and you will be obligated to declare and pay income tax on any gains in the foreign trust. Going offshore for asset protection is a legitimate strategy; going offshore to hide income from the IRS is foolish.
There exist effective, tax compliant offshore strategies to accomplish tax minimization. These strategies utilize tax-favorable treatment of foreign annuities and foreign life insurance . Preferential tax treaties between the US and foreign countries are also utilized for tax minimization. Asset protection is also a byproduct and addition benefit of these offshore tax strategies. Importantly, these strategies do not rely on secrecy.
Fact 5: Some Foreign Jurisdictions Are Better Than Others
There is no shortage of promoters of asset protection in a variety of foreign countries. You should chose a law firm that has years of offshore experience, that has analyzed the laws of various jurisdictions and has vetted the foreign trustees, attorneys, bankers and other service providers. Our experience has allowed us to chose the safest, most secure foreign countries and the most experienced and reliable foreign service providers. We have long-standing relationships with foreign bankers and trustees and we keep in the forefront of offshore developments and changes.
Conclusion
Notwithstanding the IRS successes against Swiss banks for aiding US tax fraud, offshore asset protection is still legal and still very effective, because proper offshore asset protection does not rely on secrecy or tax avoidance. In fact, having an offshore asset protection structure that is tax-compliant strengthens the asset protection, because it removes creditor leverage and removes tax non-compliance as a vulnerability to effective asset protection.
FBAR Reporting for Foreign Annuity Policies, Foreign Life Insurance Policies and Foreign Trusts
Recently, U.S. Treasury Department regulations regarding Form TD 90-22.1, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) were changed. FBAR filing now applies to foreign annuity policies and foreign life insurance policies that are owned by U.S. taxpayers, and to some beneficiaries, along with U.S. grantors, of foreign trusts. If you are subject to the FBAR filing requirement, the 2010 FBAR is due by June 30, 2011.
The FBAR is required to be filed by a U.S. person who has a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, any foreign financial account (including bank, securities or other types of financial accounts) in a foreign country, if the aggregate value of the financial account(s) exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.
Foreign Annuity Policies
Recently promulgated regulations extend the FBAR requirement to foreign annuity policies that have a cash value and are owned by U.S. persons. Under the new regulations, such annuity policies are considered a “foreign financial account”, reportable via the FBAR by the policy owner. Such annuities are reportable even if they are deferred annuities and there are no present annuity payments.
Foreign Life Insurance
A foreign life insurance policy is now reportable as a “foreign financial account” if the insurance policy is owned by a U.S. person and has a cash value. The reporting requirement applies to the policy owner, if he/she is a U.S. person. It does not apply if the policy is owned by a foreign trust rather than a U.S. client. (Note, however, that a client who is a beneficiary or grantor of a foreign trust may still be subject to the FBAR, see below.)
Foreign Trusts
U.S. taxpayers who are grantors (also known as settlors) of foreign trusts are deemed to be the owners of all trust assets for tax purposes. Thus, the FBAR filing requirement applies to such grantors, whether or not they actually control trust assets and whether or not they receive distributions from the trust.
Recently promulgated regulations extend the FBAR requirement to some U.S. beneficiaries of foreign trusts, such as foreign insurance trusts. The new regulations apply to U.S. beneficiaries of a foreign trust who have a reportable financial interest in the trust. A U.S. person has a reportable financial interest if the U.S. person had more than a fifty percent (50%) present beneficial interest in a trust’s assets or if the U.S. person received more than fifty percent of the current income of the trust. The beneficial interest in the assets of the trust must be a “present” beneficial interest for the FBAR to apply. A beneficiary of a purely discretionary trust, i.e., where trust distributions are made solely in the discretion of a trustee does not have a “present” interest. However, with respect to the trust income, a beneficiary who receives more than fifty percent of trust’s “current” (i.e., annual) income has a financial interest that is reportable on the FBAR.
Under prior FBAR regulations, there was ambiguity as to whether a discretionary trust beneficiary was subject to the FBAR. Beneficiaries of a foreign discretionary trust may only receive distributions at the discretion of the foreign trustee. The new rules clarify that only a present beneficial interest gives rise to the FBAR and only beneficiaries who receive more than fifty percent of a trust’s current income are subject to the FBAR.
Foreign trusts also give rise to filing IRS Forms 3520 and 3520-A. Please see our memorandum, IRS Reporting Requirements for Foreign Trusts.
Additional Important Points
- Even if the annuity policy or insurance policy was terminated, or a trust account was closed, during 2010, if it existed at any point during 2010, an FBAR is required
- The June 30, 2011 deadline is the deadline for receipt of the FBAR by the Treasury Department (unlike IRS Forms which must be postmarked by, e.g., April 15).
- Even if you have an extension for filing your tax returns, the 2010 FBAR is still due by June 30, 2011. There are no extensions for the FBAR deadline.
- A new FBAR form was issued in March. Please use the most recent version, which is available here.
- Original signed FBARs should be sent to:
Department of the Treasury
Post Office Box 32621
Detroit, Michigan 48232-0621
It is crucial to preserve the integrity of your offshore planning and be tax compliant.
Looking ahead, the recently enacted Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) will apply additional IRS reporting requirements, beginning in 2013.
Please share this information with your accountant.
Please contact us with any questions.